Recent content by JohnDB

Yeah.... You aren't supposed to prove my points...especially when on the opposite side of them...but whatever

Yeah... I've about come to some conclusions about these two... Not SDA Reluctant to state ANY church affiliation...(Meaning they have NONE) Low low understanding of scriptures beyond flat reading... Subject shifts Blame shifts Repeating themselves instead of actually having honest...

Yeah.... You don't know the New Testament. Don't understand the Old Testament BUT You somehow believe that you are somehow righteous enough to tell us how sinful we are for not going to church on a particular day of the week? I guess since you don't see the lack of congruity in your logic...

Remember....memorialize The...an article signifying one out of many Sabbath....cease or stop Day....capitalized and singular and....conjunction showing more requirements Keep....an imperative of holding It....singular pronoun Holy....to be pure, single-minded, good, reserved for special use...

So you are again saying you don't know the New Covenant laws or what the original 10 commandments are meaning? Is that it? Sorry but I'm having a VERY difficult time understanding what you mean when you keep changing the definitions of words.

Okay... Not once have you been able to directly quote the New Covenant Laws....not one time. AND You are promoting breaking the Sabbath Day. There is only One Sabbath Day. You keep promoting breaking it because you don't understand it, the Hebrew language behind it, or what it means.

Disrespectful discussions were made by him when he claimed that Jesus's sacrifice and New Covenant was worthless. What I said was a nothing by far comparison. Not to mention that he doesn't even keep that commandment he is pushing.

It's really not my intention to demonstrate your total lack of understanding of the New Testament almost to the point of you needing to be committed to an institution....because for whatever reason you are sticking with the most illogical conclusion possible. You are not demonstrating any of...

Okay.... Let's look at this another way. The "sermon on the mount" was Jesus's /God's "modern" commentary on the 10 commandments. 3 guesses as to which commandment was not discussed.

Okay.. Apparently you can't read the red words or understand what they mean. Basically Jesus is saying "Here's the New Covenant, Here's what it means, and now I've got to go institute it with my blood " Notice how Jesus says NOTHING about the Law of Moses.

John 13:34, 14:1

No... John quoted Jesus giving us the New Laws. Apparently you don't read them or know them. Why are you ignoring the very words of Jesus/God?

No... Your quote of John is a partial quote of Jesus giving us the commandments of the New Covenant. Say I stopped quoting the Old Covenant Ten Commandments at the summary statement and then claimed whatever was the Law based loosely on scripture out of context? You would say that we were...

Because this is a book and not a post for a colloquial discussion. Less is more!

I'm thinking that @SabbathBlessing doesn't understand how this whole debate thingy works.... He is supposed to post arguments supporting his side and not the opposition. But quoting John is not an argument for his position....I just don't think he understands debate very well....let's cut the...