Did Jesus Die on The Cross for The Just/Elect/Saved Whose Names Are Written in The Book of Life OR

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,347
494
83
When Jesus was alive but now that He's been lifted up He draws people Himself

32 And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself
No, it's the same "all":

[Jhn 6:37 KJV] 37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,338
1,993
113
the "all men" are those whom the Father draws to Christ, ...
So, it seems to me (in this part of your post ^ ) that you are not accepting what Jesus Himself said about WHO does the "DRAW" in the verse I quoted (and when, in relation to His being "lifted up" point in time):

TheDivineWatermark said:
Remember what Jesus later said?

Jhn 12:32
And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me [/unto Myself].
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,163
542
113
No, it's the same "all":

[Jhn 6:37 KJV] 37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
You're in Chapter 6 this is now chapter 12.
You're posting OLD NEWS.

The current News is 12:32 And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,347
494
83
So, it seems to me (in this part of your post ^ ) that you are not accepting what Jesus Himself said about WHO does the "DRAW" in the verse I quoted (and when, in relation to His being "lifted up" point in time):
I don't follow your point.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,347
494
83
So, it seems to me (in this part of your post ^ ) that you are not accepting what Jesus Himself said about WHO does the "DRAW" in the verse I quoted (and when, in relation to His being "lifted up" point in time):
The "all" cannot be more or different than those the Father gave to Christ to be saved.
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,163
542
113
Roger, Jesus is on His Throne. He is KING right now. He draws men for Himself. He's no longer the human Gospels Jesus. He is KING of kings and LORD of lords. He's the Resurrected Jesus right now and Forever!
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,338
1,993
113
No, it's the same "all":

[Jhn 6:37 KJV] 37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

Jn6:37a,b ^ is the same as (the distinction also spelled out in) John 6:39, John 6:40--see those verses:


--"that all THAT" (refers to "THINGS"--like "throne" ('and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David'-Lk1:32); "kingdom," etc... "things" like that);


--"that all WHO" (refers to "PERSONS")







[He's not just REPEATING in v.40 what He had just stated in v.39... but is DISTINGUISHING between...; same within v.37 (a,b); so IN VIEW of this, READ THESE VERSES CAREFULLY :) ]
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,347
494
83
Roger, Jesus is on His Throne. He is KING right now. He draws men for Himself. He's no longer the human Gospels Jesus. He is KING of kings and LORD of lords. He's the Resurrected Jesus right now and Forever!
Yes, He is, and by that, and that He being the one who brough salvation to fruition, it is His right, and prerogative, to bestow it upon
whomsoever He has chosen for it, with no disagreement nor modification to it possible from/by us. He is God.

[Rom 9:14-15, 18, 21 KJV]
14 What shall we say then? [Is there] unrighteousness with God? God forbid.
15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. ...
18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will [have mercy], and whom he will he hardeneth. ...
21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,338
1,993
113
I don't follow your point.
The "all" cannot be more or different than those the Father gave to Christ to be saved.
You're reading the various verses / passages with your "Calvinist-colored-glasses" on.











[FTR (and to be clear), I am neither Calvinist nor Arminianist; Those who say one must be one or the other, are simply NOT correct.]
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,163
542
113
Yes, He is, and by that, and that He being the one who brough salvation to fruition, it is His right, and prerogative, to bestow it upon
whomsoever He has chosen for it, with no disagreement nor modification to it possible from/by us. He is God.

[Rom 9:14-15, 18, 21 KJV]
14 What shall we say then? [Is there] unrighteousness with God? God forbid.
15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. ...
18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will [have mercy], and whom he will he hardeneth. ...
21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
You know Paul is telling this while explaining why God has now chosen to allow the Gentiles to become heirs of the Kingdom. Paul is saying if God can do this in (your verses) then God can bring in the Gentiles.

Why do you cherry pick verses and not present Entire Chapters because that's where the "true meaning" for what is written comes from?
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,347
494
83
Jn6:37a,b ^ is the same as (the distinction also spelled out in) John 6:39, John 6:40--see those verses:


--"that all THAT" (refers to "THINGS"--like "throne" ('and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David'-Lk1:32); "kingdom," etc... "things" like that);


--"that all WHO" (refers to "PERSONS")







[He's not just REPEATING in v.40 what He had just stated in v.39... but is DISTINGUISHING between...; same within v.37 (a,b); so IN VIEW of this, READ THESE VERSES CAREFULLY :) ]
Still lost but I think I disagree. Can you state it more simply? If you are saying you think they pertain to things other than those
who are to become saved, I would definitely disagree with that. But perhaps I am still missing your point.

The "all" in v37 sets the predicate for the other "all" and this is confirmed by v40 and v44:

[Jhn 6:40, 44 KJV]
40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day. ...
44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,347
494
83
You're reading the various verses / passages with your "Calvinist-colored-glasses" on.











[FTR (and to be clear), I am neither Calvinist nor Arminianist; Those who say one must be one or the other, are simply NOT correct.]
I am reading the words using logical association.
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,163
542
113
Do you speak in tongues, Roger?
Your prophet John Calvin did!

Here's a bit of enlightenment for those Reformed Calvinist in this thread

On several occasions, Calvin, in his devotions, found himself uttering a lingua non nota et cognota mini. That is, the language was not known or understood by him. Himself a skilled linguist, Calvin set about to discover the orthography of the utterance.

He was speaking in tongues.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,347
494
83
Do you speak in tongues, Roger?
Your prophet John Calvin did!

Here's a bit of enlightenment for those Reformed Calvinist in this thread

On several occasions, Calvin, in his devotions, found himself uttering a lingua non nota et cognota mini. That is, the language was not known or understood by him. Himself a skilled linguist, Calvin set about to discover the orthography of the utterance.

He was speaking in tongues.
No to tongues. Speaking in tongues could only occur during a very short biblical timeframe - until the Bible was completed in Revelations 22. After that, no further true spiritual revelation was possible.
John Calvin isn't my prophet and I resent you saying that he is.
Is that all you got?
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,163
542
113
No to tongues. Speaking in tongues could only occur during a very short biblical timeframe - until the Bible was completed in Revelations 22. After that, no further true spiritual revelation was possible.
John Calvin isn't my prophet and I resent you saying that he is.
Is that all you got?
You believe the same things he did. So that makes you kindred spirits.
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,163
542
113
Roger,
I absolutely believe that You and myself could be sitting next to each other, watch a ball roll across the street, but by time you explain how it happened and I explain the reader would be so confused they would run away.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,347
494
83
You believe the same things he did. So that makes you kindred spirits.
Well, given as there is only one salvation stated in the Bible, it should come of no surprise if multiple readers
come to the same conclusions regarding salvation. The foundation and apex of which, is Christ alone
as Saviour (yes, spelled Saviour with a capital "S"), and that man is not his own saviour. It's quite simple, really.

[2Co 11:3 KJV] 3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,347
494
83
Roger,
I absolutely believe that You and myself could be sitting next to each other, watch a ball roll across the street, but by time you explain how it happened and I explain the reader would be so confused they would run away.
Probably.