Opening Daniel's timeline

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,398
5,508
113
62
#41
what needs to be realised most Cameron is Ishmael has only passed into the conscious of Christians and no more,..

There's more to it God sent Ishmael on his way because he loved him.
He secured his future by giving him a promise 🙂 it wasn't a curse he gave him.
Ishmael isn't in the line of promise. All the blessings given to him are temporal and earthly.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#42
Ishmael isn't in the line of promise. All the blessings given to him are temporal and earthly.
there's lots of rumors on this some Christian scholars have contested this. And some contesting Ishmael was also linked to the midianites.

The midianites are descendants of Isreal today who may well have helped brought about the worship of Yahweh more than anyone else.

And Arabs today even recognising this.

The jury is out on this one I guess.

And it won't matter the sentiment is lost already
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#43
Ishmael isn't in the line of promise. All the blessings given to him are temporal and earthly.
depends on how you look at the promise cam

This is my view

God saved hagar and Isreal from dying of first in the wilderness, then gives Ishmael a promise of giving birth to a nation.

The original promise was God saved Ishmael in the wilderness which is still in promise today
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#44
I will do the best I can to explain this series of events. Okay, let me put this on a timeline. Hypothetically, let's say the church is raptured next year on Passover, that would be April 24, 2024. After the rapture occurs, several events will take place. The two witnesses will be revealed. Then the antichrist will be revealed. Thirdly, the 144,000 will receive the mark of the Father on their foreheads, the world will know who they are.

I believe your question concerns the time the two witnesses will finish confirming Christ's new covenant, the one Daniel 9:27 speaks of. After the 3 1/2 years, the two witnesses are killed and taken into heaven. The 3 1/2 years they witnessed will close out Daniel's prophesy of 490 years. Also, at that time, the antichrist will suffer a deadly wound. It's now his high priest, the second beast comes into view. He will heal the deadly wound of the antichrist, do great wonders, build an image of the antichrist, and will cause everyone to receive the mark 666. Those who refuse will be put to death. This period is called the Great Tribulation. It will last for 3 1/2 years; it has nothing to do with the 490-year prophesy. When the 3 1/2 years are over, that's when the Lord returns and takes vengeance on his enemies. That date would be, April 2031, exactly 2000 years from the time of his ascension in April of 31 A.D.
Your thoughts
I take it you believe there may be substance to this date of 24 4 2024 being a rapture date , I mean that's not just any hypothetical number is it 🤔 especially since you use all the the fours with the 144.000
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,398
5,508
113
62
#45
depends on how you look at the promise cam

This is my view

God saved hagar and Isreal from dying of first in the wilderness, then gives Ishmael a promise of giving birth to a nation.

The original promise was God saved Ishmael in the wilderness which is still in promise today
Israel came through Isaac, not Ishmael. Some promises are for this world, and some are eternal.
Making Ishmael a promise is evidence that God gives grace and mercy to all. It also was a grace to Abraham, who loved Ishmael and desired good for him.
But mostly, it served God's purposes to test Israel and deliver His people.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#46
Israel came through Isaac, not Ishmael. Some promises are for this world, and some are eternal.
Making Ishmael a promise is evidence that God gives grace and mercy to all. It also was a grace to Abraham, who loved Ishmael and desired good for him.
But mostly, it served God's purposes to test Israel and deliver His people.
Remember the words of Jesus.

If you hunger for righteousness come to me and I will feed you.

Well Ishmael was dying of thirst in the wilderness and God fed him.

I was not asking you about any other promise. I was asking if that promise is still in existence
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,398
5,508
113
62
#47
Remember the words of Jesus.

If you hunger for righteousness come to me and I will feed you.

Well Ishmael was dying of thirst in the wilderness and God fed him.

I was not asking you about any other promise. I was asking if that promise is still in existence
Sure, that promise is in effect. But Ishmael's hunger was only for worldly things.
There has always been a heritage of promise. Abel and Cain. Isaac and Ishmael. Jacob and Esau. But it began with Satan and the seed of the woman.
One line was spiritual and eternal. The other line carnal and temporal.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#48
Sure, that promise is in effect. But Ishmael's hunger was only for worldly things.
There has always been a heritage of promise. Abel and Cain. Isaac and Ishmael. Jacob and Esau. But it began with Satan and the seed of the woman.
One line was spiritual and eternal. The other line carnal and temporal.
I thought you had the strong belief when God saves his children they remain saved
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#49
Sure, that promise is in effect. But Ishmael's hunger was only for worldly things.
There has always been a heritage of promise. Abel and Cain. Isaac and Ishmael. Jacob and Esau. But it began with Satan and the seed of the woman.
One line was spiritual and eternal. The other line carnal and temporal.
how do you know Ishmaels hunger was only for worldly things
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#50
Sure, that promise is in effect. But Ishmael's hunger was only for worldly things.
There has always been a heritage of promise. Abel and Cain. Isaac and Ishmael. Jacob and Esau. But it began with Satan and the seed of the woman.
One line was spiritual and eternal. The other line carnal and temporal.
Have you ever thought God gave Ishmael a promise because he recognised Ishmeal was Abraham's first born 🤔🤨😊😱
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,398
5,508
113
62
#51
I thought you had the strong belief when God saves his children they remain saved
I do. But Ishmael wasn't saved from wrath. He was only saved from death. I will grant you that physical saving, in general, pictures spiritual salvation. But that's not what God is picturing her.
Isaac is the child of promise because his birth is supernatural. Sarah is barren and yet still has the child promised to her and Abraham. Ishmael is a child born of sin and pictures the natural man.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#54
I do. But Ishmael wasn't saved from wrath. He was only saved from death. I will grant you that physical saving, in general, pictures spiritual salvation. But that's not what God is picturing her.
Isaac is the child of promise because his birth is supernatural. Sarah is barren and yet still has the child promised to her and Abraham. Ishmael is a child born of sin and pictures the natural man.
it doesn't answer all three questions Cameron because your basing your assertion Ishmeal was born through a lack of faith from Abraham, but yet abraham son isac still received a promise

You say ishmeal was not of faith but what about Abraham not believing God's promise that God would not bore him a son to Sarah.

People say Abraham son Ishmeal was illegitimate because the child was born under a lack of faith.

But what about the lack of faith Abraham was living under when he bore Isaac 🤔

Why should any promise be different
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,398
5,508
113
62
#55
it doesn't answer all three questions Cameron because your basing your assertion Ishmeal was born through a lack of faith from Abraham, but yet abraham son isac still received a promise

You say ishmeal was not of faith but what about Abraham not believing God's promise that God would not bore him a son to Sarah.

People say Abraham son Ishmeal was illegitimate because the child was born under a lack of faith.

But what about the lack of faith Abraham was living under when he bore Isaac 🤔

Why should any promise be different
Abraham was often unfaithful. People tend to remember his faithfulness when he raised his knife to sacrifice Isaac and forget that he often failed to trust God leading up to that point. And this certainly is one aspect of the story of Abraham. But what I'm referring to is the promise of God that Sarah would bear Abraham a son and the faithfulness of God to fulfill that promise. The promise of God's faithfulness is pictured in Isaac, not Ishmael. God made no such promise concerning him.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#56
Abraham was often unfaithful. People tend to remember his faithfulness when he raised his knife to sacrifice Isaac and forget that he often failed to trust God leading up to that point. And this certainly is one aspect of the story of Abraham. But what I'm referring to is the promise of God that Sarah would bear Abraham a son and the faithfulness of God to fulfill that promise. The promise of God's faithfulness is pictured in Isaac, not Ishmael. God made no such promise concerning him.
your failing to recognise the lack of faith came from Abraham not Ishmeal.

Traditional rules has always been that the first born should inherit the first rights, and be the first predecessor of the father.

Those are the rules in the middle east those where traditions no doubt set in place by God too.

It is without doubt abraham was to receive the promise to pass on.

Its the same story with Jacob stealing Esau birth right,

Could you say both where acting out of faith because both where born from a lack of faith
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,398
5,508
113
62
#57
your failing to recognise the lack of faith came from Abraham not Ishmeal.

Traditional rules has always been that the first born should inherit the first rights, and be the first predecessor of the father.

Those are the rules in the middle east those where traditions no doubt set in place by God too.

It is without doubt abraham was to receive the promise to pass on.

Its the same story with Jacob stealing Esau birth right,

Could you say both where acting out of faith because both where born from a lack of faith
God choosing to bless Abraham, then Isaac, then Jacob demonstrates the sovereignty of God. And He does so despite their frailty and lack of faith at times. It is a reflection of His faithfulness.
If you want to believe more of Ishmael, you are free to do so. But it misses the point. The Bible is about God and what He has and is doing; it's not primarily about man.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#58
God choosing to bless Abraham, then Isaac, then Jacob demonstrates the sovereignty of God. And He does so despite their frailty and lack of faith at times. It is a reflection of His faithfulness.
If you want to believe more of Ishmael, you are free to do so. But it misses the point. The Bible is about God and what He has and is doing; it's not primarily about man.
ok buddy well if you could see God more in
all that I've said that would be better place to go. Never mind eh.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,398
5,508
113
62
#59
ok buddy well if you could see God more in
all that I've said that would be better place to go. Never mind eh.
I'm trying to narrow your focus.
Have you read Proverbs? God juxtaposes things to highlight differences. A popular theme is the wise verses the foolish.
In the same way, God uses people in biblical stories to juxtapose the spiritual from the natural man. This is what God is highlighting in Isaac and Ishmael.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
#60
I'm trying to narrow your focus.
Have you read Proverbs? God juxtaposes things to highlight differences. A popular theme is the wise verses the foolish.
In the same way, God uses people in biblical stories to juxtapose the spiritual from the natural man. This is what God is highlighting in Isaac and Ishmael.
are you favoring the promise given to isic more than Ishmeal because you believe the birth was a super natural birth Sarah had

There's no evidence the birth was on the same grounds as Jesus, I sense it was a natural birth not super natural.